There’s an abundance of mainstream media, by the hour, to convince “vaccine hesitant” Americans to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. “Vaccine hesitant” is the new phrase for anyone who’s done enough research to determine that the COVID-19 vaccine is the most unnecessary vaccine in the history of vaccines, lending it an eerily questionable feel. Just why do the CDC and Dr. Fauci, backed by every government agency and almost every democratic elected official, want you to receive a vaccine for a virus that, even given its wildly exaggerated case and death counts, is over 99.8% survivable?
Given the lies surrounding COVID-19, in fact, it’s inconceivable that a journalist would spend so much time trying to convince others to receive the vaccine. But that’s just an average day for most journalists in 2021. And Mike Littwin, who put out another piece in the Colorado Sun about the inherent safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, uses interesting logic to sell the shot.
What logic does Littwin use to ensure the vaccine is safe for everyone? No logic at all. First, he sets off into a diatribe about anti-vaxxers who believe that the COVID-19 vaccine causes people to acquire magnetic blood…as Littwin himself acknowledges, though, only the craziest anti-vaxxers believe this outlandish theory, which has been debunked several times over. That said, Littwin uses the craziness of the magnet frenzy to ask, “And you wonder why something like half of Americans still haven’t gotten vaccinated. Could it be, as Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank suggests, a fear of becoming stuck to a passing UPS truck?” He implies that the magnet theory may the the only reason, or even a main reason, for “vaccine hesitancy.”
Then, after meandering about the magnet craze for several paragraphs, Littwin stokes fear in his base at the mere mention of variants, “The fact that so many are dying across the world, with no chance to be vaccinated, is what’s relevant. And there’s another relevant fact: So long as variants spread worldwide, they could still be coming to a city near you.”
“Coming to a city near you.” Colorado should be generally terrified at that outlandish premise, right? Variants should scare the ever living daylights out of the “vaccine hesitant,” and those who haven’t been inoculated yet will be in a rush to finally get the vaccine…in the world of left wing journalism, that’s the reality of how journalists believes propaganda works.
But most media sources do nothing to explain the lies surrounding COVID-19 and the lies surrounding the vaccine to date. In a June 2021 study published by Science Direct, a previously healthy 86 year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Fifteen days later, he collapsed at breakfast and was admitted to the hospital with gastritis. By day 23, the patient had developed acute renal insufficiency. On day 24 post vaccine, the hospital roommate to the study participant tested positive for COVID-19. On day 25 post vaccine, the study patient developed lung crackling, was placed on oxygen, and tested positive for COVID-19. The patient passed away on day 26 with acute renal and respiratory failure.
As the scientists concluded, “In summary, the results of our autopsy case study in a patient with mRNA vaccine confirm the view that by first dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity can already be induced, while sterile immunity is not adequately developed.”
Mainstream media is no better. Since March of 2020, the baseless means of obtaining COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death rates are alarming.
As previously reported, after almost a year of the suspicious public crying foul about PCR tests and the threshold count that was set too sensitively at 37 viral loads by the WHO, the threshold of “Coronavirus” present in positive tests was lowered the day Biden assumed the office of the President.
Lowering the PCR count caused at least a 90% reduction in “cases.”
“According to an April 2020 study, a CT of 17 must be used to obtain 100% confirmed real positives. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. At 33 cycles, the false positive rate is 80%. Beyond 34 cycles, the false positive rate reaches 100%.” The WHO was using a PCR count, prior to Biden’s inauguration, of 37.
“For several months, experts have highlighted the true cause behind the COVID-19 pandemic, namely the incorrect use of PCR tests set at a ridiculously high cycle count (CT), which falsely labels healthy people as “COVID-19 cases.” In reality, the PCR test is not a proper diagnostic test, although it has been promoted as such.”
“An important question that demands an answer is whether the experts at our federal health agencies and the World Health Organization were really too ignorant to understand the implications of using this test at excessive CT, or whether it was done on purpose to create the illusion of a dangerous, out-of-control pandemic.”
According to Bloomberg, “The Pfizer and BioNTech SE shot is 96% effective against hospitalization after two doses, while the AstraZeneca and University of Oxford Covid inoculation is 92% effective, according to an analysis announced Monday by Public Health England. Those results are comparable with the protection offered against the alpha variant, which first emerged in Britain, the data show.”
But what does that even mean? Very little, as it turns out. As of May, the CDC changed its testing guidelines once again…this time to ensure that only vaccinated people are testing negative for whatever COVID-19 is, and unvaccinated people are testing positive.
If a patient is unvaccinated, the CDC will run a PCR test at 45 cycles, almost three times higher than the recommended cycle threshold count for anything but COVID-19 and eight counts higher than the CDC previously used before lowering the PCR CTC in January of 2021. This ensures rising case counts for the unvaccinated.
If a patient is vaccinated, the CDC will run the PCR test at 28 cycles, which is still eleven cycles higher than the recommendations it put forth on the day of Biden’s inauguration. Therefore, cases will continue to exist even in vaccinated people, but will occur at a much lower rate than in unvaccinated people.
People Magazine was quick to point out this week the baseless claim, “Although COVID-19 hospitalizations have continued to decrease amid widespread vaccine distribution, unvaccinated people are still at risk of more serious health problems from the virus.”
Where did People obtain this data? They obtained it from NBC. NBC News says “Virtually all hospitalized Covid patients have one thing in common: They’re unvaccinated.” Where did NBC obtain this data? Two doctors told them that’s been true in their experiences…in other words, the media is spreading propaganda, not data or facts, once again when it comes to COVID-19.
Still, those who know what constitutes actual cases, hospitalizations, and deaths have lingering questions.
Any patient who is hospitalized within thirty days of a positive COVID-19 diagnosis, via PCR tests, is considered a COVID-19 hospitalization. If a patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 1st but broke his knee and went to the emergency room today, he would be considered a COVID-19 diagnosis. Anyone displaying symptoms of COVID-19 at the hospital is considered a COVID-19 hospitalization.
Additionally, as we reported in December, PIC,“pneumonia, influenza, or COVID related illness” now replaces pneumonia and influenza in the CDC’s reporting those illnesses and deaths. Pneumonia and influenza are both presumed to be “COVID-19 related.”
All of this, and more, to say…COVID-19 makes no sense at all. Therefore, the COVID-19 vaccine is still shrouded in mystery. As propaganda piles up amidst data that’s harvested and presented to ensure an outcome, the question remains as to why this vaccine is so important.